রবিবার, ২৫ জানুয়ারী, ২০১৫

Meeting, Agenda and Minutes

Meeting
Conducting Meeting:  General Body Meetings and meeting of smaller groups. 
Notice
Notice period.
The day, date, time and place of the meeting and the business to be transacted should be mentioned in the notice. The items of business may be mentioned in the notice itself if their number is small, otherwise, they should be listed in a separate sheet and attached to the notice as Annexure.


Crown Cement Industries Limited
Registered Office: 40, Shatmashjid Road,
Dhaka- 1209

06 April, 2014
Notice

Notice is hereby given that the Second Meeting of the Board of Directors will be held at the registered office of the company, 40 Shatmashjid Road at 12:30pm on Friday, 11 April 2014.

The Agenda is attached.

Md. Asif Jaed
Secretary


To Members of the Board of Directors



Agenda
Agenda is an official list of things to be done or dealt with at a particular meeting. It is drawn up by the Secretary in consultation with the Chairman. At the meeting the business is normally transacted in the order in which it is listed in the agenda. When the agenda is given as an annexure to a notice, or circulated separately it contains the following elements:
i.                     Name of the organization/group and the date of circulation.
ii.                   The day, date, time and place of meeting.
iii.                  The programme of business to be transacted.
iv.                 The background papers or information, if any.
v.                   Signature of the Secretary.
If the agenda forms part of the notice, only the business to be transacted is indicated because other details will already be there in the notice.
Crown Cement Industries Limited
Dhaka-1209
6 April, 2014

Agenda for the Second meeting of the Board of Directors to be held at 12:30pm on Friday, 11 April 2014 at 40 Shatmashjid road, Dhaka.

Agenda:
2.01 Confirmation of the minutes of the last meeting.
2.02 Confirmation of the appointment of Directors.
2.03 Appointment of the Managing Director of the company.
2.03 Accommodation for the branch office at Matijhil.
2.04 Issue of prospectus
2.05 Date for the next meeting.
2.06 Any other matter with the permission of the chairman/Miscellaneous.


Asif Jaed
Secretary



Minutes
The official records of discussions held and decisions taken at a meeting are called minutes. Minutes are generally written by the secretary of the organizational unit. Keeping minutes is a legal requirement. They serve as an aid to memory and provide a basis for action.
Minutes usually contain the main points of discussion, the conclusions reached, the recommendations made, and the tasks assigned to individual members and groups. They are not a verbatim record of the proceedings of a meeting. The emotions and feelings, if any, expressed by members during the course of discussion are generally not recorded. A clear, concise, accurate and well-organized summary of the business transacted is all that is required. Minutes, in fact, are a special type of summary of what happened at a meeting.
The following items are generally given in minutes. Keep them in mind.
i.                     The name of the organizational unit, e.g. Finance Committee, Board of Trustees.
ii.                   The date, time, and place of the meeting.
iii.                  The number of meeting if it is in a series, e.g. Sixth Meeting of the Board of Directors.
iv.                 The name of the chairman of the meeting.
v.                   Names of members present, of those who could not attend, and those who attended by special invitation.
vi.                 Record of transactions.
vii.                Signature of the secretary and the chairman.
The minutes become final only when they have been read at the next meeting, approved by the members and signed by the chairman. Often the minutes are circulated to members beforehand and then at the next meeting the chairman confirms them after ascertaining that members have no amendments to suggest.


Crown Cement Industries Limited

Minutes of the Second Meeting of the Board of Directors held at the Register Office of the company(40 Shatmashjid Road, Dhaka) at 12:30pm on Friday, 11 April, 2014.
Present:
1.       Md. Mamunar Rahsid      Chairman
2.       Md.
3.       Md.
4.       Sri.
Absent:
1.       Md.
2.       Md.
In attendance: Asif Jaed, Secretary

No. of Minutes
Subject of Minutes
Details of Minutes
2.01
Confirmation of the minutes of the last meeting
The minutes of the meeting held on January 12, 2014 were approved by the Board and signed by the Chairman.
2.02
Confirmation of the appointment of Directors
The Secretary reported that all the Directors present had accepted the office and signed the agreement to take the required number of qualification shares. He also stated that these documents had been filled with the Registrar of Companies.
2.03
Appointment of the Managing Director of the company.
Resolved: That Mr. Shariar Ahmed be appointed Managing Director of the Company.
2.04



2.05



2.06






Md. Ahsan Habib                                                                                                  Asif Jaed
Chairman                                                                                                              Secretary 15 April, 2014





শনিবার, ১৭ জানুয়ারী, ২০১৫

Justify the title “Heart of Darkness”. Discuss with examples why it is darkness from your reading of the novel.

By Rabita Rahman Southi (Batch 40)                                                                                                                                       

   "The Horror...The Horror..."
(Kurtz, Heart of Darkness)

                                                                                                              
Yes...this is the horror of the  revelation that the life you have been evoking with an epic grandeur is not even a mere poem, the horror of knowing that you are an exile within your own belonging, the horror of being disenchanted and disillusioned and loosing the spirit to celebrate yourself, the horror that leaves you suffocating within your own “chronotopes”, the horror of being in between nowhere, the horror of your own “being”, the horror of your essence that haunts you, the horror that takes your breath away, the horror of losing your own self while revering that of some other, its only the horror. Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is the exploration of this horror that haunts, torments, exploits and leaves one suffocating, in this case leaving someone (Mr. Kurtz) exhausted at his death bed. It is the exploration of a human heart that couldn't reveal the horror and the darkness cultivated within him and when the revelation came, the cry was no more than a breath. Conrad through his artistic mastery has associated the universal humane essence of darkness with that of a continent which has been detected as a “Dark” one, awfully. In his hand the darkness lying within a human heart and stands one for the entire humanity, that couldn't detect its catharsis until the final moment, gets its resemblance with the setting of its happening which is regarded as “Dark” through its representation and again we are left with the questions hovering around the air surrounding us that, which darkness he actually has tried to talk about, project onto-Is the continent dark at all? Or, is it the representation and perceptions that makes it dark? Or, is it only the heart which is dark, which lacked its restraint and was not able to turn over the attributed “Darkness” over a continent, community or group of people? The Heart of Darkness, on its journey through a land awaiting exploration, both geographical and cultural, and inviting in doing so, implies a number of philosophies and ideas associated with the title of it, which itself awaits and attempts exposition at the same time.


As it’s been said in the novel, that “the thing was to know how many powers of darkness claimed him for their own”-this expression at once includes the entire universe and the people practicing colonial power on others for “their” own beneficial agencies, and Mr. Kurtz stands as one figure representing and including all other like him, whose demand of powers have been ultimately the access to the powers of darkness. Living in the heart of Darkness, geographically, Mr. Kurtz, himself remains identifiable with the idea and essence of “darkness”, who eventually climbs to the urge of being mad, which is complemented by the loneliness and the primeval, infantile but also hellish stages of existence of his surroundings. Mr. Kurtz, conforming to the demand of a setting that allows its inhabitants to go beyond their extents, skunks into darkness that grabs the essence of his being to such an extent that he no more remains a regular human rather succumbs to his daemonic stature among his natives.

However, this lack of restraint prevailing in Mr. Kurtz can as well be speculated through the Freudian inspection of the core humane psychic culmination of id, ego and super-ego, as termed by Freud. Mr. Kurtz, left into the widening gyre of a land where “anything can be done”, is dominated by his “id” or desire to transgress every sort of social boundaries, while the all-allowing stature of the land provides him with the comfort of being free from the moral-ethical bindings of the super-ego, and so his “ego” steps beyond its limits and submerges all the notions of humanity to some extent. Since “id” is very often interpreted as the darker sides of human psyche which needs to remain suppressed through the workings of social set of beliefs termed “super-ego”, the novel can be said a revelation of the heart where darkness dwells, an exploration of the human urge to break through and showing up the extent of being to which one can succumb. This un-interpretable, non-examinable, indefinable and mysterious interaction of the human psyche with its outward world has tried and fashioned its wings through the character of Mr. Kurtz into the novel. He is both rescued and enslaved at the same time by this overwhelming association with the apocalyptic desires to outrun, arose within him. Kurtz, who both rules and is entrapped by the natives, perishes as he encounters both his and Africa's Heart of Darkness.

The impenetrable jungles of the journey, devoid of the ray of sunshine, the uncanny stillness that cannot be penetrated through, the unlightened spheres of lands submerged with water, in short, the setting of the novel itself contributes to the darkness implied on both human and geographical locations within the text. Conrad’s narration of the events and the suggestive depiction and description of events and places contemplates the very literary interpretation of the title as suggesting the dark land, Africa in its surface level. Again this western gaze of the orient, in specific, Africa as a center of irrational and savagery articulation of madness, makes the way for Mr. Kurtz to continue with his un-restrained state of mind and uncontrolled and undoubtedly inhuman actions on the people he lived among. His various lusts has been curved and complemented by the land he came into suddenly and where he was given access to the utmost of freedom at once. His exercise of this freedom lacked the sense of limit and control while Marlowe overpowers and arises over him in this regard.

“... No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one’s existence—that which makes its truth, its meaning—it’s subtle and penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live, as we dream—alone....”


This impossibility to assert and analyze the essence of one’s existence remains at the center of Heart of Darkness. The truth and the meaning remains ambivalent towards its readers as well who can never fix up with the darkness of the continent and the human psyche. Marlowe, widely assumed as the protagonist of the novel and his journey through the dark, impenetrable jungles of Africa and its lands ends up as a journey into the deepest cores of human psyche. The continent itself emerges hand to hand with the continent floating within human unconscious and thus the Heart of Darkness stands parallel and analogues between both the heart and darkness, both the human and the land and nothing but the title chosen for it would have fitted it better than that.

Trace out the Freudian concept of Oedipus Complex from your reading of Sons and Lovers by D. H. Laurence.


By Oishy (Batch 40)

The fundamental triangle of family (father- mother- child) and the didactic relationships between sons and mothers, can reformat, transgress (as Sigmund Freud claims) to the oedipal liaison of lovers. D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers can be alleged as a case study of Freudian oedipal association of that sort. The merger between Gertrude Morel & her sons (especially Paul), arises from the customary mother- son affection, as the novel progresses, to an alarming phase, which Freud has termed as “oedipal bond”. Through Paul’s early years to the novel’s end, his mother’s strong stimulus, exclusion of the father, rejection of outsourced attractions and loss of identity in the mother’s absence, evokes Freud’s conception of Oedipus Complex in this Lawrentian masterpiece.

According to Sigmund Freud, the boy wishes to possess his mother and replace his father, who the child views as a rival for the mother's affections. The Oedipal complex (proposed in 1899, in The Interpretation of Dreams) occurs in the phallic stage of psycho-sexual development between the ages of three and five. Freud suggested that while the primal id wants to eliminate the father, the more realistic ego knows that the father is much stronger. According to Freud, the boy then experiences what he called “castration anxiety” - a fear of both literal and figurative emasculation. In order to resolve the conflict, the boy then identifies with his father. It is at this point that the super-ego is formed. The super-ego becomes a sort of inner moral authority, an internalization of the father figure that strives to suppress the urges of the id and make the ego act upon these idealistic standards. In the Morel family, first Gertrude – William, then Gertrude - Paul oedipal relationships take power where, Walter soon became an outsider in his own house, present in body but isolated entirely by Gertrude, feared by his children. He doesn't understand completely how and why all this has happened and tries to find silence in liquor, the kind that cannot dissolve tragedy. Paul Morel, unable to find the strong father figure in Walter, to form the egoistic identity, loses the balanced structural unification with the mother, where the id takes over.

Within the family, where Walter Morel has virtually no parental authority, moral or otherwise, he is most unlikely to assert his right as the “object of Gertrude’s desire” which according to Freud the role of the father should be. So Gertrude is determined to live through her children, especially her sons- Paul most of all. After William’s death he is desired by Gertrude not as a son but as a husband, and he responses, in his eyes she becomes “a fine little woman” (117).  The consequences are serious. Oedipal feelings prevail and allows the creation of symbolic triangle (Father- Mother- Child) that constitutes the functional family environment, in which identification with the father creates the child’s “ego- ideal”, mother becomes the pole around which reality becomes constituted and father becomes the catalyst for building “super- ego”.

The primary constraint on Paul’s development is his mother, rather than his father. It is Mrs. Morel that Paul resembles and loves and who forms the psychological barrier that Paul repeatedly comes up against in his drive to know himself. Mrs. Morel is central to Sons and Lovers and it is fascinating to observe how Lawrence mingles and presents the different facets of her personality ranging from the bright, young and delicate woman captured by the vibrant animal magnetism of her dark, earthy husband, to the unhappy wife, the woman trapped in an environment hostile to her impulses and wishes, the caring mother who also makes huge emotional demands on her sons, the constant sufferer and the relentless tormentor. The woman trapped in a marriage that fails to be what it should - the sacred union in the flesh - will become a familiar Lawrentian theme, but this trapped woman will never break free, will not even try to, except indirectly through her children, will constantly  pursue authoritative existence among her sons, Paul particularly. An obvious question arises over the name Gertrude, who very much in nature resemblance the Gertrude from Shakespeare’s Hamlet. Both women (literally or figuratively) has killed their husbands for a third influence & both having severe fixation over their sons. Kinglsey Widmer describes Mrs. Morel primarily as a destructive figure in Paul and William’s lives, writing:

“Her Protestant ethos of self-denial, sexual repression, sexual  fixation toward her sons, impersonal work, disciplined aspiration, guilt, and yearning for conversion-escape, not only defeats her already industrially victimized coal-miner husband but also contributes to the defeat of several of their sons.”

Nevertheless, some of the usual consequences of the Oedipal complexes are known to have flawed outcome, and Paul’s case is an extreme instance of such. Unable to develop a mature relationship with his father, he is still the child of an – absent, emotionally non- existing father, as Lacan defines to be the outcome of Oedipus complex. Paul, as Lawrence describes “seemed old for his years”. He was particularly attuned with how his mother felt: “When she fretted, he understood and could have no peace…His soul seemed always attentive to her” (55). And then during convalescence from bronchitis, Paul was allowed to share his sick bed with his mother, which he relished, he finds: “Sleep is still most perfect….when it is shared with a beloved” (64). The next stage follows when Paul brings Gertrude a spray and a basketful of blackberries, she accepts it, playfully, “in a curious tone of a woman accepting a love token” (65). Thus Paul accepts his role as his mother’s confident, her life partner, listening patiently to her musings and worries; and during his father’s hospitalization with a broken leg, Paul fancies himself, “the only man of this house”, his father’s replacement.

The stark realism of the novel is relieved and complemented by poetic messages that communicate this mysterious element, and portray the female in mystical connection with the other. At the age 14, Paul has no significant goal for his life, other than to earn  30 / 35 shillings by working somewhere near home and then “when his father died, have a cottage with his mother, paint and go out as he liked, and live happily ever after” (85). At his early adolescence, Gertrude’s overriding emotions are still focused on Williams, which was soon changed when the double trauma of Williams’ death and Paul’s brush with mortality solidifies Gertrude’s determination to hold onto Paul; when Aurther has proven to be too much like his father, inept to be repository of her hopes for the future. However Gertrude’s designs are to be challenged by Miriam Leviers & Cora Dawes. 

Miriam and Paul’s love blooms slowly, a large part of it being entirely unacknowledged. Paul insists her as being a student and a friend, to complicate matters; he feels anxiety, anger for the sexual feelings she arises in him. When he is teaching her, he is impatient- derivative of his repressed Oedipal feelings and the sense of guilt that follows. Gertrude, for her part recognizes Miriam as a threat, a rival of Paul’s attachments & feelings. She vents her anger & jealousy at Miriam, “She wants to draw him out and absorb him, until there is nothing left…” In the description of the visit to Lincoln Cathedral Paul depicts his mother with great, poetic sensibility. Here, once more, she is shown as something otherworldly, a being akin to divinity, remote from this world, strange and wonderful as an angel. It is impossible to avoid the thought that, whatever else it may be, it is also Paul’s own fear of losing her that is being reflected in this striking mythicization of her. At chapel, when Miriam, Paul and Gertrude share the same pew, Paul seemingly succeeds in uniting his both lovers: “wonderfully sweet and soothing to sit there for an hour and a half…. Uniting his two lovers under the spell of the place of worship” (183). But his peaceful delusion doesn’t last long and he notices “a violent conflict in him. His consciousness seemed to split”.

Neither Miriam, during the week at her grandmother’s cottage and not Clara, during their stay at Lincolnshire coast, can bring Paul more than ephemeral respite. The affairs provide no more than an occasional play of the beloved’s role and yield only momentary satisfaction- as his anger, anxiety, hatred, sense of betrayal toward his mother quickly returns after the encounters.  In time, when Miriam goes on with her life without him, Cora continues with her husband, Paul reassures to Gertrude “You know, I don’t care about them, mother” (350). And so after much effort, Gertrude conquers her rivals, wins complete pyrrhic victory. In Gertrude’s death bed, when Paul meets her, both he & Gertrude were “afraid of the veils that were ripping between” (367). Upon learning that she’s dead, Paul rushes upstairs “put his face to hers and his arms around her: My love- my love- oh, my love! He whispered again and again” (379)

As a character, Paul Morel has his own flaws, and tends to see many of these personal defects (vanity, selfishness, etc.) in others, especially the people closest to him – and these are often things he “detests” about them. This is the psychological phenomenon Freud has called a “projection”: “a process of dissimilation, by which a subjective content becomes alienated from the subject and is, so to speak, embodied in the object. The subject gets rid of painful, incompatible contents by projecting them” (Interpretation of Dreams 242). The practice tends to exacerbate rather than alleviate Paul’s troubles. After his mother’s death, Paul seemed to suffer the loss of identity, unable to sustain existence without the duel authority of his mother and himself, which, in Paul Morel, takes the shape of an intricate and consistent mythicization of the female. A notable projection of a male personality and a process that satisfies both the author’s wish to move beyond the narrowly personal and develop in his fiction his dualistic metaphysics (centered upon the conflict between the mind and the body, the Apollonian and the Dionysian), as well as Paul Morel’s need to dramatize his internal conflicts.

Lawrence seeks to discover the particular feminine essence, the female core in human existence. This might be seen as an essentialist view, affirmation of a female essence accessible to women as individuals. Lawrence believes in femaleness as a universal principle and insists that it lies within the woman’s instinctive wisdom to discover and preserve it as the most valuable gift of nature. Without his mother’s sour but demanding presence and her daily disillusionment with the world, Paul might not have developed his love for painting or his desire to transcend his provincial roots. Paul’s tortured relationship with his mother actually allows him to develop his own ideas about the meaning of individuation and fulfillment.


“…the Oedipus complex must collapse because the time has come for its disintegration, just as the milk-teeth fall out when the permanent ones begin to grow…it is nevertheless a phenomenon which is determined…when the next pre-ordained phase of development sets in.” (Freud, From The Dissolution of the Oedipus Complex, 1924). Freud’s own optimism about the delusional oedipal attraction to fall in like “the milk- teeth” seemingly didn’t work on our protagonist. The freedom however, which Lawrence provides at the end, proves to be fatal then amusing, turns into loss of identity than the absence of chains. Still Paul moves on, with the mother “on memories” - which providentially comprises fragility. 

Trace out the Freudian concept of Oedipus Complex from your reading of Sons and Lovers by D. H. Laurence.

By Rabita Rahman Southi (Batch 40)

                                        “Alas! The Love of women!
                                          It is known to a lovely and fearful thing.”
                                                                           -Lord Byron (Don Juan, Canto 2,199)

Lawrence and his protagonist Paul Morel, from the novel Sons and Lovers, both has been contributed by, designed through, sprout from and curved by the love of the women of their lives, love that has attributed meaning to their existence, love that has made them . Their psyche has been enchanted and dominated by the perpetual obligation, devotion and willing suspension to the love that has constructed their beings, in this case specifically the love of their mothers. Sons and Lovers, being an autobiographical text, is the tale of sons that turned to be lovers for their mother, and couldn't ever take their turns as lovers for the other women of their lives, it’s the tale of a mother who turned to her sons for the love she has been craving for from the husband, it’s the tale of a husband who denied to love his woman enough and sunk into jealousy with his own sons within whom the wife did seek for solace. The father-mother-child triangle of familial bondage thus takes its flight into a transgression of the regular conception of a mother-son relationship through the reversal and replacement of role-plays that circles its fullest through continuous and final conformity by the son (Paul Morel in specific) to the “oedipal bond” and a psychological denial to be in bondage with any other woman, except the mother and thus the traces of the term “Oedipal complex”, coined and popularized by Sigmund Freud fashions its wings into the novel in a very expressive manner.

As the Freudian concept of Oedipal complex ascribes, in the book
The Interpretation of Dreams (1899), the desire of the male-child to assert its possession over his mother through the replacement of the father-figure, who is regarded as a rival by the child, ultimately resolute itself by ending into subtle jealousy and an engraved anguish towards the father, we find Paul Morel’s development as an individual extremely influenced by the sense of possession and his crisis of locating himself within the family as the “only man” stands prior to his concerns. According to Freud, the interaction between the psychic expositions like id, ego and superego takes place through the confrontation of apocalyptic desire guided by the id, realistic knowledge of the ego that the father cannot be over-merged in terms of power and finally the contribution of the super-ego to the resolution of suppressing the id-dominated desire, the internalized perception of mother-son relationship meets its finality. In Sons and Lovers, Paul and other sons like Williams are haunted by their self-imposed vow of loyalty towards their mother which constructs their rejection of the patriarchal authority of their father, Arthur Morel and also their failure to sort out any successful love-affair with any other woman can be defined in the light of this psychoanalytic exposure.

From the very beginning of the novel, we are introduced to a husband-wife relationship which though started up with enough potential, tends to be a sheer failure, which is between Walter and Gertrude Morel. Turning from her own personal relationship Gertrude Morel takes refuge in their son Williams at the first hand and later in Paul more vividly. But we find the father, Walter Morel jealous of the baby Williams who serves as a shelter for his mother. Here comes the essence of rivalry in part of the father. The sons as well take on their freights of rivalry by their exclusive association and devotion to their mother and through their commitments to her. They are committed to their own mother; the way a lover becomes committed to his/her beloved. Walter Morel soon becomes an outsider in his own house where he is alienated by other family members, priory by Gertrude and feared by the assertions of his own children. He opts out for his escape in alcohol which makes him more vulnerable and less of an ideal father-figure consequently. Paul Morel, incapable of finding out the strong father-figure in Walter Morel, which is complementary to his formation as an individual and egoistic identity, fails to achieve a balanced structural unification with the mother and its basic tenets of being a didactic relationship; while the id-nurtured desire to possess over mother takes over the scene in turn.

Throughout the entire passage of the novel, we find Gertrude Morel as a mother whose self-assertion gets its way into the excessive sense of possession over her children. She lives through her children, especially her sons-Paul most of all in the later parts of the novel. The hollowness created by the death of William, is tried upon by Gertrude to be filled up through her more intimate association with Paul. She tries to reconnect herself to her idea of love and Paul becomes the medium while being desired by his own mother as a beloved rather than a son. Paul responds positively as well and even prays for and even fantasizes the death of his father. In Paul’s agile mind, his mother stands as the only lofty person. He cannot control himself and handle it successfully as a consequence of his serious subjugation with the notion of Oedipus complex and so he loses his ability to love other women.”He was afraid of her. The fact that he might want her as a man wants a woman had in him been suppressed into a shame. When she shrank in her convulsed, coiled torture from the thought of such a thing, he had winced to do depths of his soul. And now this purity prevented even their first kiss. It was as if she can scarcely stand the shock of physical love, even a passionate kiss, and then he was too shrinking and sensitive to give it”.  Confronted by other women like Miriam and Clara, Paul succumbs to a failure to establish himself within a successful love-affair and to a great extent conforms to the Freudian idea of “good girl”, resembling the mother.  His most passionate love has always been in dedication to his beloved mother. Neither Miriam, during the week at her grandmother’s cottage and not Clara, during their stay at Lincolnshire coast, can bring Paul more than ephemeral respite. The affairs provide no more than an occasional play of the beloved’s role and yield only momentary satisfaction- as his anger, anxiety, hatred, sense of betrayal toward his mother quickly returns after the encounter. His mother awfully complements this inability of him by her rejection of female entrances into his life. Paul cannot pull himself out of the belief that he has lost the power which supports and gives meaning to his life; his mother, after the death of Gertrude Morel. He cries again and again in his personal soliloquies and addresses his mother passionately as “My love, my love---oh, my love!” Paul seemed to suffer the loss of identity, unable to sustain existence without the duel authority of his mother and himself, which, in Paul Morel, takes the shape of an intricate and consistent mythicization of the female. Although he grows up, he can’t transcend the love between the baby and mother; he can’t build up a right super-ego concept to control his instinctive impulsion which goes against morality and ethics; and can’t make his emotional development healthily. Thus the mother-son relationship, though unable to consummate into physicality, remains vulnerable to the oedipal notion of a triangular family based complex.

Thus, Sons and Lovers, one of the most representative texts of the modern era, stands as an in-depth dissection of the psyche of the human mind and the formation it takes place through the influences of its catalyst factors. The way the Morel family and its sons came into their beings as lovers, as sons, as a persona is the way an individual takes his/her form on. The love of the mother or the love of a woman, as speculated by Byron and Lawrence himself as well, who himself said every sort of woman to be something frightening, as every man knows, serves as crucial to the construction of the lovers in the sphere of one single family, and in this case the woman is the mother. The text stands as an exclusive exploration of the psychoanalytic prospects of humane attributes and actions and among them the exposition of oedipal complex is prior to its concerns. The inter and intra-personal relationships within one single family, specially the mother-son one, leaves its readers with the greater prospects of analyzing through the psychic assertions of personalities. 

Brief Summary of Waiting for the Mahatma

Book Summary – Waiting for the Mahatma by R.K. Narayan

This is not one of wait to see the emancipation of one’s lot, rather it is of how a selfish individual waits for the Mahatma’s clearance to get married to the girl of his choice. The protagonist, Sriram, is an insipid person who can be easily influenced by anyone.  He grows up under the loving care of his grandmother, after the early death of his parents. When he is twenty, his grandmother hands over the fat sum of money she had been saving in his name.  His irresponsibility  is known immediately, when he wants to withdraw a huge sum of Rs. 250, but his watchful grandma restricts it to a decent Rs. 50.
Sriram then goes to the neighborhood shop and gives a tenner to pay for colored drinks and plantains worth four annas (25 np).  The shopkeeper, Kanni, makes a reference of some ancestral debt which is unknown to Sriram till then and sets off the remainder as the repayment towards Singaporean cheroots his grandpa ordered and smoked while he was alive. Sriram loiters in the market and purchases a piece of furniture because ‘the money in his pocket clamored to be spent’.

When he’s twenty-four, he comes across a pretty girl who seeks a donation.  It is love at first sight for him – he wants to know her age, caste, eligibility for marriage, etc (but not her name), and puts eight annas in her box (without even the rudimentary knowledge of the purpose of donation) and thereafter sets upon the task of getting the details. He finds out from a jaggery merchant that the girl collected money in connection with the visit of Mahatma Gandhi.  At the same time, Sriram regrets not pursuing college education, which would have taught him the polish of treating a girl well. 

Sriram goes to the venue on the banks of the Sarayu and admires the air of importance with which the volunteers go about with their jobs.  He overhears a conversation whereby the official interpreter of the meeting, Municipal Chairman, Natesh, is pointed to as one who runs with the hares and hunts with the hounds. On the second day, Sriram manages a closer seat with an air of authority on him, but feels guilty about looking at women who, the Mahatma stated, were ‘mothers and sisters’.  He could not stare at the men, who were either shop-keepers or school teachers, and ‘a most uninteresting and boring collection of human faces’.  He was also afraid that Gandhiji may read his mind.

He is unable to grasp the Mahatma on non-violence (his ‘confidence’ in his having understood ‘everything’ ever since he operated his bank account, bites the dust).  When the Mahatma speaks about untouchability, he remembers how his granny always kept the scavenger a good ten yards away by adopting a bullying tone and how he added fuel to the fire by taunting him; he also recollects that the scavenger went about with his work, unmoved. Sriram spots the girl who asked donation on the dais.  When he notices her wearing khaddar, he promptly changes his opinion of khaddar from being the apparel fit only for cranks to how lovely it can be.  He wonders whether the wearer brought beauty to the material or whether it was good by itself.  He admires her confidence in facing a crowd.  But, he starts wondering if his grandmother would approve of a dark girl, if she were so.  He recollects that grandma had already seen one girl who’s a yokel with her tight oily braid, gaudy village saree, et al. He tries to get closer to the girl when the Mahatma alights the platform, and promptly regrets his dressing up in a mull dhoti and not in a khadi dhoti.  He tails the Mahatma to his hut in the sweeper’s colony, and promptly recollects what a tough life they live.  The reader is appraised of the double standards which the Municipal Chairman applies, to host the Mahatma at his mansion, to no success.  But, that is not the end to the administration’s effort to impress the Mahatma.  His camping in the sweeper’s colony makes it spick and span, and free from all the garbage which is usually strewn all over. The reader is introduced to Gandhiji’s multi-tasking, but shortly afterwards, Sriram is told that he should leave.  Since it is the donation girl who says it, his exit leads to an introductory conversation between them.  He wants to be a volunteer, but realizes that there are a few requirements like truthfulness and discipline, to become one.  She is Bharati, often aggressive and stern in her behavior; but, she tells him that she lost her father to the Non-Co-operation Movement in 1920, and her mother a little later, and that she was adopted by the local Sevak Sangh and actually christened by the Mahatma.  If only to keep her company, Sriram agrees to meet Gandhiji the following morning. Meanwhile, Granny is so alarmed at the thought of Sriram being in the camp of an individual who sought to make untouchables enter temples, and involve people in difficulties, that Sriram’s teacher, who appreciates the boy, gets a piece of her mind.

The next morning, Sriram is introduced to Bapu and is given the privilege of accompanying the latter on his morning walk.  Sriram becomes more cautious in his replies, as he fears that the saintly Mahatma may actually see through his lies. Sriram is allowed to accompany the Mahatma’s tour of the villages provided Granny concurs. Since she is not in favor of the freedom movement and the Mahatma’s doctrine of Ahimsa, she comes across to Sriram as an ill-informed, ignorant and bigoted personality.  He knows he could not lie to the Mahatma that he had taken Granny’s blessings; at the same time, he wouldn't be patient with her as she speaks condescendingly about the Mahatma.During his conversation with Granny, she tries to find out if he had eaten non-vegetarian food.  Sriram puts her thoughts to rest, extolling the Ahimsa doctrine of the Mahatma.  The talk then moves to Granny fasting every night (in deference to a social custom meant for widows), which goes unnoticed and the hue and cry about the Mahatma’s fasts.  She makes him have dinner; and Sriram realizes it’ll be his last, at home. Rather than expressly take Granny’s permission, he leaves behind a note of farewell and goes into Gandhiji’s camp.

Sriram is happy with the respect he gets from the villagers, which he thinks is a function of being a Gandhian.  Sriram gets a new perspective of village life, which is drastically different from the hitherto-imagined one of green trees, step-tanks and temple spires and the like.  Sriram gets a shock when he notices an impoverished village just twenty miles from Malgudi but he adjusts himself to it, if only to be a team-mate of his beloved.

When Gandhiji departs, his assistant Gorpad goes along, while Bharati, Sriram’s ‘Guru’ stays back.  One gets an idea of how people flocked to see the Mahatma and how unassuming and normal he was amid all this. 

Following the Mahatma’s departure, Sriram shifts to a deserted shrine on the slopes of the Mempi hills.  He feels the Mahatma’s presence, in absentia.  He recollects his tryst with the spinning wheel, another failure of his.  He eventually learns to spin the wheel and gets appreciated by the Mahatma.

After the imprisoned Mahatma gives the call of Quit India, Bharati assigns Sriram the task of spreading the message.  Sriram, whose nationalism was a means to attain Bharati, wonders why he should waste a lot of paint to write the letter, ‘Q’, which seemed to be a part of the British ploy to drain the country of its black paint.  During such activities, the reader gets to know of counters to Quit India – Quiet India, doubts over Indians’ capabilities of self-governance, etc. – which indirectly bring out Sriram’s dismal failure in conquering his own self. In addition, one learns of ‘fake’ nationalists who claim to have donated for Gandhiji’s cause and put his picture on a wall in their office, but actually indulge in deforestation and assistance to the British.  One also comes across a British planter who actually offers hospitality to Sriram and tells him politely yet firmly that he was as attached to India as the latter was and that he would not want to quit India.  One also gets to understand the general chaos and double standards of the people as well as Sriram's - although he does his duty as a worker of the national cause, he has an inner conflict about going back to his comfortable home on Kabir street. His adventures as a freedom activist of the Mahatma’s path give the reader occasions to laugh.  Meanwhile, he even tries to marry Bharati by force but she insists that she wouldn't marry him without Bapu’s sanction.  Bapu feels it’s not yet time for them to get married, but advises them to surrender at the nearest police station.  Sriram takes it as turning down and feels dejected, whereas Bharati takes it as Bapu had written and plans for productively passing time in jail.  This time Sriram does not want to accompany her but asks her if she’d marry him at the end of it all, and with Gandhiji’s permission – she agrees to it.

The susceptibility of Sriram to any kind of influence is demonstrated by his coming under at the tutelage of a pseudo-Gandhian, Jagadish by name, a terrorist who wears khadi and has a photo studio for the front end.  With a few words of appreciation, Jagadish makes him a willing slave, makes Sriram work hard to further his sinister intention, and even sets up a secret radio at the abandoned temple, which served as Sriram’s residence, to communicate with the Indian National Army.

During the course of transcriptions of the radio messages, Sriram even gets to hear the voice of the legendary Subhas Chandra Bose, but the message gets disturbed.  Sriram is naive enough not to understand Jagadish’s continuation of the message.  Jagadish even gets Sriram to derail a train by offering the bait of talking to Bharati – and Sriram agrees to it, only for the sake of Bharati, and becomes a ‘Wanted’ person for the police.  Now to meet Bharati he has to shave off his head and grow a dropping mustache like a Mongol.  While growing the mustache, he indulges in various seditious acts, which he begins to enjoy, if only as a source of relief from his lonely and isolated life.  Whenever he wonders if the Mahatma would ever approve of his activities, Jagadish uses the name of Bapu to divert the topic and put Sriram’s doubts to rest.

When he actually goes to meet Bharati, she sends Sriram a message that subterfuge cannot be done, and that he should go and see his granny who’s said to be very ill.  Sriram goes to his home in the dead of the night, in disguise, but his voice betrays him and the neighborhood shopkeeper recognizes him.  From him, Sriram learns that Granny had passed away the previous night, and that she was not her usual self  ever since she learnt that her grandson had abandoned home to get after a girl, and that he was also a Zigomar.  The shopkeeper, Kanni, gives him food (on credit) but, however, does not betray him for the award on Sriram’s head.  Since Sriram cannot lead Granny’s funeral procession, he seeks Kanni’s help, with the freedom to spend as much as needed.  Kanni’s due diligence and commitment to the family is contrasted with the family priest’s greed.  After certain rituals are followed, and certain others, rejected by Sriram, the funeral pyre is lit, and then Granny moves her toe!  Before she is burnt alive, the fire is doused (despite the priest’s disapproval!) and she is nursed well till the doctor arrives and treats her and, advises that she be taken back home.  The priest considers this as inauspicious, and his objection is sustained this time.  So she’s taken to an abandoned old building, between the river and the town.  She recovers, people pour in at this miracle, and the police come looking in a couple of days.  Granny advises him to keep away from who make him tread the wrong path.  He goes away along with the police after putting her to sleep and entrusting her to the care of Kanni.

Sriram quickly adjusts to jail life.  Since he is detained under the Defense of India Rules, he can be retained for as long as the police wanted.  His efforts to get a little more privacy for the prisoners is scoffed at by the prison authorities, who let him off with a warning.  Since he did not surrender himself along with Bharati, he wasn't a political prisoner; he spent his days with several prisoners undergoing varying terms of rigorous imprisonment.  They are known by the offenses they have been convicted of, and Sriram realizes that they had humanity in them in that they wondered why he derailed a train at the instance of one individual, especially when he had got no profit out of it!  He looked forward to stone breaking sessions because they took him out of the jail, even if under surveillance.  Conversations between prisoners centered around what brought them there, future plans, philosophical discourse, bullying, et al, which kept him away from gloom.  He would be in the company of loneliness after all his cell-mates fell asleep.  He would wonder if Bharati got married to her compatriot (who, incidentally used to address her as ‘sister’), or if she’d direct the shooting party if he were caught  making his escape.

One day, Sriram gets a visitor who brings him the news that Granny had since shifted to Benaras, that she requires money, and he had come to seek Sriram’s permission to send the amount of accumulated money of rent on the house to her.  It is news to Sriram that the house had been let out (with due precaution on vacation) to a yarn merchant, and that his belongings had been kept safe in the end room.

Sriram dreams of escaping from the cell and getting Bapuji’s nod for helping all prisoners escape.  In this connection, he seeks the help of the bully of the jail who is philosophical enough to advise him against it; the bully even suggests that Sriram marry a ‘good girl’ and not the ‘jail-bird’!  This makes Sriram get annoyed and give up the idea.

With the news of Indian’s impending independence reaching the jail inmates, there is hope of release, but the doubt is whether non-political prisoners will be released.  Despite the jail chief’s suggestion to represent his case for classification as political prisoner, he thinks that Bharati may not approve of it and is on his own till his turn comes for release.

Sriram has some requests from his cell-mates which are more of the wishful thinking variety, but actually spends half of his jail earnings on the tips to the warders, who tailed him on that count.

While ordering for ‘good’ food at his favorite eatery, Sri Krishna Vilas, Sriram gets to know of the now-prevalent evils of hoarding, adulteration, etc., which come as a rude shock to him since he expects independent India to be better than British India.  Sriram goes to Jagadish who is now a photographer, who showcases an album of India’s struggle for Independence- an album which includes their hideout in the abandoned temple – and rues fact that his chronicling does not win him a post of power.  Sriram feels sad that all the service he had done only helped a photographer to showcase his talent.  He then realizes that the inspiring underground worker was no more than an ego-centric fellow!  But his visit serves the purpose in that Sriram learns that Bharati was amongst the earliest political prisoners to be released, and that she had left for Noakhali in East Bengal, where communal riots were on.  Jagadish suggests Sriram write to her but ends up writing it himself.  

Pat comes the reply that Sriram can meet her after January 14th.  During his journey, Sriram realizes his not knowing Hindi prevented him from socializing, though jail-life taught him to be his own companion.  He has a close shave with fanatics, who let him go only because he and they share the religion.  On top of all that, the train is crowded to the fullest, and he cannot get his favorite coffee.
  
Anyway, on reaching Delhi, he finds Bharati waiting for him – he’s worried about his appearance whereas Bharati is affectionate.  She arranges to get his clothes washed (he expects that she does it for him as a wife would have done). She cares for a lot of homeless refugee children, and tells him that the Mahatma had not been able to spare a thought about their marriage since he is pained by the suffering of the women during Partition.  She gives a detailed account of the Mahatma’s work during Partition, of how he gave solace to the sufferers and changed the perpetrators forever, and of his according supremacy of humanity over religion.  She adds that Bapu and his team were under threat, and that she had decided to take her life rather than give up her honor, if it came to that.  She tells him that she was given the special charge of children, who have been given names of birds and flowers, and that Bapu once said that even a number would be better than a name, if a name meant branding a man on the basis of religion.  She recollects the reasons why the conversation about their marriage did not proceed on two previous occasions.

An appointment is taken for the next afternoon, and Sriram is worried about his answers to Bapu’s possible questions, but Bharati tells him that he can say anything, as long as it is the truth.  Now Sriram dreams about the arrangements to make in case of a ‘yes’.  When they observe the busy Mahatma from a distance, Sriram wants to back off, but Bharati insists that Gandhiji wanted them to meet him that day.  When the meeting finally takes place, Sriram confesses to Bapu that he had actually indulged in violence.  The Mahatma talks about the purification effects of fasting and Bharati offers to do it on Sriram’s behalf.  It is time for the evening prayer, and finally Sriram requests Bapu’s permission to marry Bharati.  Gandhiji blesses them and suggests the next day as the date of the wedding, offers to officiate and also give the bride away.  As he moves towards the prayer venue, he turns round and expresses a premonition that he may not attend the wedding and stresses that it should go on despite his possible absence and Bharati agrees to it.

Only on turning the page of the book does the reader realize that this was the prayer meeting where the Mahatma was assassinated.


Short Summary of “Waiting for the Mahatma” by R. K. Narayan

In Waiting for the Mahatma (1955), Narayan uses as background the Indian Freedom Movement, from which he, like so many other Indian writers of the time, had derived the basic nationalism that sense of place and time and some idea of who you are so necessary to the writing of realist fiction.

Narayan, as a young man, was forbidden by his family to have anything to do with the agitators for freedom. The more benign aspects of the British presence in India the new educational institutions, the new career opportunities had brought their own kind of freedom to many Indians, including people in Narayan’s family.

His father, the headmaster, knew where his future lay when he adopted modern ways and turned his back on his tradition-minded parents and brothers; and then, too, Narayan’s own writing came to depend heavily on patronage by British publishers and readers. He, like many members of the new and insecure colonial bourgeoisie, could not but feel a profound ambivalence about the mass movement against the British ambivalence never clearly expressed but always present in his writings.
There is a short story he wrote soon after independence, “Lawley Road,” which portrays some of the confused impulses and blind nationalism of that mass movement. The story, which is included in Malgudi Days, describes how the statue of a British man called Lawley is scornfully dismantled and sold and then reinstated by the municipal authorities after Lawley is discovered to be the creator of Malgudi.

But it is in Waiting for the Mahatma that you find a franker ambivalence about that anti-colonial struggle and its impact on the Indian masses. Here many more Indians are making of the Freedom Movement whatever suits their private narrow ends: men eager to revere Gandhi as a mahatma, eager to be touched by his aura of holiness, while remaining indifferent to, or simply uncomprehending of, his emphasis on developing an individual self- awareness and vision.

There is the corrupt chairman of the municipal corporation who has replaced, just before Gandhi’s visit to Malgudi, the pictures of English kings and hunting gentry in his house with portraits of Congress leaders; he then worries about the low-caste boy Gandhi talks to sullying his “Kashmir counterpane.” There is the novel’s chief protagonist, Sriram, another feckless young man in Malgudi, who joins the 1942 Quit India movement after falling for Bharati, an attractively gentle and idealistic young woman in Gandhi’s entourage.

Sriram drifts around the derelict, famine-stricken countryside, painting the words “Quit India” everywhere, arguing with apathetic and hostile villagers about the need to throw out the British. His weak grasp of Gandhi’s message is confirmed by the fact that he lets himself be persuaded by an egotistical terrorist to become a saboteur. He is arrested and spends years in jail, longing for Bharati. His abandoned grandmother almost dies and then goes off to live her last years in Benares; and then Gandhi himself, devastated by the massacres and rapes of Partition, is assassinated on the last page of the novel.

Even before his death, as Waiting for the Mahatma shows, Gandhi’s spirit had been absorbed into the ostentatious puritanism of the men who came to rule India, the uniqueness of his life and ideas appropriated into the strident Indian claim to the moral high ground a claim first advanced through Gandhi’s asceticism and emphasis on nonviolence, and then, later, through the grand rhetoric of socialism, secularism, and nonalignment.

In fact, Gandhi alone emerges as the active, self-aware Indian in the novel, struggling and failing to awaken an intellectually and emotionally torpid colonial society, a society made up overwhelmingly of people who have surrendered all individual and conscious choice, and are led instead by decayed custom and herd impulses, in whose dull, marginal lives Gandhi comes as yet another kind of periodic distraction.

The one other person who embodies individual initiative and positive endeavor in the novel and he makes a fleeting appearance turns out to be a British tea planter; and Narayan makes him come out very much on top in his encounter with Sriram. He is friendly and hospitable to Sriram, who has painted the words “Quit India” on his property. Sriram, unsettled by the tea planter’s composure, tries to assume a morally superior position. Narayan shows him floundering, resorting fatuously to half-remembered bits and pieces of other people’s aggressive anti-British rhetoric.